RFR(XXS): 8241951: ClhsdbCDSCore.java failed to find core file
Chris Plummer
chris.plummer at oracle.com
Fri Aug 7 22:34:28 UTC 2020
On 8/7/20 3:26 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>
>
> On 8/7/20 6:25 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> On 8/7/20 3:22 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
>>> On 8/7/20 3:11 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>>>> On 8/7/20 6:03 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please review the following:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8241951
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cjplummer/8241951/webrev.00/index.html
>>>>
>>>> test/lib/jdk/test/lib/util/CoreUtils.java
>>>> L139: if (Platform.getOsVersionMajor() == 10 &&
>>>> Platform.getOsVersionMinor() >= 15) {
>>>> Should the major version check be ">= 10"?
>>> If I'm going to check for >= 10, then it needs to be something like :
>>>
>>> if (major > 10 || (major == 10 && minor >= 15)
>>>
>> if (Platform.isSignedOSX()) {
>> if (Platform.getOsVersionMajor() > 10 ||
>> (Platform.getOsVersionMajor() == 10 &&
>> Platform.getOsVersionMinor() >= 15))
>> {
>> // We can't generate cores files with signed
>> binaries on OSX 10.15 and later.
>> throw new SkippedException("Cannot produce core
>> file with signed binary on OSX 10.15 and later");
>> }
>> }
>>
>> I'll send an updated webrev if you're ok with this
>
> I'm okay with (I don't need another webrev), but other folks might
> want one...
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cjplummer/8241951/webrev.01/index.html
Still testing.
Chris
>
> Dan
>
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> Chris
>>>>
>>>> Platform.isSignedOSX() would return true for signed 11.X.
>>>> Dunno.
>>>>
>>> Yes, it would return true for 11.x if signed, which is what we would
>>> want.
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>> Thumbs up.
>>>>
>>>> Dan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We need to disable SA core file testing on OSX 10.15.* and later
>>>>> when the binary is signed because OSX will no longer produce core
>>>>> files with this configuration.
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list