RFR: 8285416: [LOOM] Some nsk/jdi tests fail due to needing too many virtual threads [v2]

[David Holmes]

On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 02:25:38 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplummer at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> There are a few nsk debugger tests that pin multiple virtual threads to carrier threads when synchronizing. Sometime the default number of carrier threads (which equals the number of CPUs) is not enough, and the test deadlocks because virtual threads start to wait forever for an available carrier thread. This PR fixes this problem by using the `jdk.virtualThreadScheduler.parallelism` property to change the default number of carrier threads. I believe the largest number of carrier threads any test needs is 11, so I chose 15 just to be safe.
>> 
>> I had initially tried to fix each individual test by using the test support in `VThreadRunner.setParallism()`. The advantage of this was limiting the scope of the change to just a few tests, and also being able to specify the exact number of needed carrier threads. The disadvantage was having to make quite a few changes to quite a few tests, plus I had one troublesome test that was still failing, I believe because I didn't fully understand how many carrier threads it needed. Just giving every test 15 carrier threads in the end was a lot easier.
>
> Chris Plummer has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Better comments.

> Are saying that in addition to the changes in this PR I should also change each of the tests to add a check to make sure parallelism is set high enough?

I was, but now I see the tests involved and the fact this problem is just an artifact of running those tests in virtual threads, then I really don't want to see those tests polluted with VT specific code. I know more now about the issue with pinning on monitor entry and not being able to increase parallelism for that case - but ideally that would indeed by the fix and I'll look into that some more.

But this fix is approved. Thanks.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by dholmes (Reviewer).

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11735