RFR: 8299240: rank of JvmtiVTMSTransition_lock can be safepoint
Serguei Spitsyn
sspitsyn at openjdk.org
Tue Feb 14 05:45:34 UTC 2023
The rank of JvmtiVTMSTransition_lock is better to be safepoint instead of nosafepoint.
The fix includes removal of the function `check_vthread_and_suspend_at_safepoint` which is not needed anymore.
Testing:
mach5 jobs are in progress:
Kitchensink, tiers1-6 (all JVMTI, JDWP, JDI and JDB tests have to be included)
-------------
Commit messages:
- 8299240: rank of JvmtiVTMSTransition_lock can be safepoint
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12550/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=12550&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8299240
Stats: 49 lines in 6 files changed: 8 ins; 30 del; 11 mod
Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12550.diff
Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12550/head:pull/12550
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12550
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list