RFR: 8299240: rank of JvmtiVTMSTransition_lock can be safepoint
Serguei Spitsyn
sspitsyn at openjdk.org
Fri Feb 17 04:43:30 UTC 2023
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 05:37:51 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn <sspitsyn at openjdk.org> wrote:
> The rank of JvmtiVTMSTransition_lock is better to be safepoint instead of nosafepoint.
> The fix includes removal of the function `check_vthread_and_suspend_at_safepoint` which is not needed anymore.
>
> Testing:
> mach5 jobs are in progress:
> Kitchensink, tiers1-6 (all JVMTI, JDWP, JDI and JDB tests have to be included)
PING! This is relatively simple update.
The testing is clean and has not found any regressions.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12550
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list