RFR: 8291555: Implement alternative fast-locking scheme [v25]

[David Holmes]

On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 18:46:47 GMT, Roman Kennke <rkennke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> I've reviewed the changes in v23 and v24. Trying another
>> Mach5 Tier1 job set.
>
>> I've reviewed the changes in v23 and v24. Trying another Mach5 Tier1 job set.
> 
> I just now pushed a simple change that changes the log message 'inflate(fast-locked)' to 'inflate(has_locker)' to make those tests happy.

@rkennke this still seems to be very much a work-in-progress rather than actual PR review at this stage. Perhaps it should move back to draft until you actually have something you think is ready for integration?

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10907