RFR: 8291555: Implement alternative fast-locking scheme [v25]
Fei Yang
fyang at openjdk.org
Wed Mar 15 07:43:32 UTC 2023
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 18:46:47 GMT, Roman Kennke <rkennke at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I've reviewed the changes in v23 and v24. Trying another
>> Mach5 Tier1 job set.
>
>> I've reviewed the changes in v23 and v24. Trying another Mach5 Tier1 job set.
>
> I just now pushed a simple change that changes the log message 'inflate(fast-locked)' to 'inflate(has_locker)' to make those tests happy.
@rkennke : Hi, I have prepared some extra changes for RISC-V to make it work. See attachment.
BTW: You might also want to use -w instructions in MacroAssembler::fast_unlock for aarch64.
[more-riscv-changes.txt](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/files/10977109/more-riscv-changes.txt)
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10907
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list