RFR: 8291555: Implement alternative fast-locking scheme [v26]

[Roman Kennke]

On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 06:05:38 GMT, Thomas Stuefe <stuefe at openjdk.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> > Agreed. But I don't think "Thin locks" is an option as that was specifically an IBM locking implementation. Historically Hotspot's locking mechanism has internally been referred to as stack-locks, so I would suggest UseNewStackLocks
> 
> 
> 
> They don't use the stack anymore; would this not be us using a wrong name just for history's sake?

Well, it's still got the lock-stacks. :-D

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10907