RFR: 8291555: Implement alternative fast-locking scheme [v26]

Thomas Stuefe stuefe at openjdk.org
Thu Mar 16 06:08:34 UTC 2023


On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 05:45:29 GMT, David Holmes <dholmes at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Agreed. But I don't think "Thin locks" is an option as that was specifically an IBM locking implementation. Historically Hotspot's locking mechanism has internally been referred to as stack-locks, so I would suggest UseNewStackLocks

They don't use the stack anymore; would this not be us using a wrong name just for history's sake?

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10907


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list