RFR: 8320515: assert(monitor->object_peek() != nullptr) failed: Owned monitors should not have a dead object [v8]
Stefan Karlsson
stefank at openjdk.org
Tue Nov 28 07:22:13 UTC 2023
On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 22:46:15 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty <dcubed at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Stefan Karlsson has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fix indentation
>
> test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/Monitor/libMonitorWithDeadObjectTest.c line 2:
>
>> 1: /*
>> 2: * Copyright (c) 2022, 2023, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
>
> nit: why include 2022 in the copyright header?
Because the test was copied and built upon a test that was created in 2022.
> test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/Monitor/libMonitorWithDeadObjectTest.c line 28:
>
>> 26: #include <pthread.h>
>> 27: #include <stdio.h>
>> 28: #include <unistd.h>
>
> Should these be in sort order?
Yes
> test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/Monitor/libMonitorWithDeadObjectTest.c line 121:
>
>> 119: create_monitor_with_dead_object(env);
>> 120:
>> 121: // DetachCurrenThread will try to unlock held monitors. This has been a
>
> nit typo: s/DetachCurrenThread/DetachCurrentThread/
Done
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16783#discussion_r1407317548
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16783#discussion_r1407318161
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16783#discussion_r1407319756
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list