RFR: 8337563: NMT: rename MEMFLAGS to MemFlag

[Thomas Stüfe]

Just to state: if the majority wants a rename , that is of course fine. The
existing name is admittedly a bit of an eyesore.

On Thu 8. Aug 2024 at 13:33, Thomas Stüfe <thomas.stuefe at gmail.com> wrote:

> I like it short, succinct and greppable.
>
> NMTCategory? NMTCat?
>
> That said, I can live with the current name and dread the cv backporting
> and support implications of this change.
>
> On Thu 8. Aug 2024 at 10:50, Gerard Ziemski <gziemski at openjdk.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 04:47:18 GMT, David Holmes <dholmes at openjdk.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > If you called it `MemTypeFlag` - which to me still suggests
>> mutually-exclusive values - then you would not need to rename all the
>> variables with "flag" in their name later.
>>
>> Hmm, not a bad idea. Are there any other opinions?
>>
>> -------------
>>
>> PR Comment:
>> https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20497#issuecomment-2276354395
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20240808/af9fcbb8/attachment-0001.htm>