RFR: Trivial enhancement to avoid costly deletion array element

Roman Kennke rkennke at redhat.com
Fri Aug 17 14:34:50 UTC 2018


Yes I have seen that one before. It's traversal or even partial-only iirc.

Am 17. August 2018 14:46:43 MESZ schrieb Zhengyu Gu <zgu at redhat.com>:
>
>
>On 08/17/2018 08:19 AM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>> On 08/17/2018 03:07 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>>> On 08/16/2018 10:36 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>>>> Trivial enhancement to avoid deletion array element, which may need
>
>>>> costly shifting tailing elements.
>>>> Webrev:
>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/shenandoah/replace_nm/webrev.00/
>>>
>>> Looks good!
>>>
>>> Have you seen this code as hot, or that was a hunch? It it fine
>either 
>>> way.
>> 
>> No, it is not hot. I stumbled over while chasing a weird assertion
>failure.
>> 
>> Have you seen this? 
>> https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/LyRkIj2w77dxFdWOv49yqA
>> 
>> or just my super *hot* computer tried to throw me something
>interesting :-(
>
>Okay, reproduced again, I guess it is not a hoax.
>
>-Zhengyu
>
>> 
>> -Zhengyu
>> 
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Aleksey
>>>

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.


More information about the shenandoah-dev mailing list