RFR(T) 8229318: Shenandoah: Assertion failure in nightly test

[Aleksey Shipilev]

On 8/8/19 6:05 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
> On 8/8/19 11:59 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> On 8/8/19 5:51 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>>> My bad, updated.
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/JDK-8229318/webrev.01/
>>
>> But... This goes to sh/jdk, right? Why does it have bug id?
> Humm, we don't need bug id to fix shenandoah? so it will upstream under other bug id?

I thought if this fix is a follow-up to the upstreamable change that is staging in sh/jdk, it would
be folded into that change? The whole point of staging is to accumulate the fixes for the clean
upstreaming.

>> It is a bit weird it accepts _index in [0; size]. Is _index == _size even meaningful?
> Yes, when the table is full. The table will be expanded on next insertion.

Okay then.

-- 
Thanks,
-Aleksey