RFR(T) 8229318: Shenandoah: Assertion failure in nightly test
Zhengyu Gu
zgu at redhat.com
Mon Aug 12 12:52:35 UTC 2019
On 8/9/19 4:48 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> On 8/8/19 6:05 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>> On 8/8/19 11:59 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>>> On 8/8/19 5:51 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>>>> My bad, updated.
>>>>
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/JDK-8229318/webrev.01/
>>>
>>> But... This goes to sh/jdk, right? Why does it have bug id?
>> Humm, we don't need bug id to fix shenandoah? so it will upstream under other bug id?
>
> I thought if this fix is a follow-up to the upstreamable change that is staging in sh/jdk, it would
> be folded into that change? The whole point of staging is to accumulate the fixes for the clean
> upstreaming.
I see. You want me to drop this bug id and make it a dup?
>
>>> It is a bit weird it accepts _index in [0; size]. Is _index == _size even meaningful?
>> Yes, when the table is full. The table will be expanded on next insertion.
>
> Okay then.
Thanks,
-Zhengyu
>
More information about the shenandoah-dev
mailing list