shenandoah-dev Digest, Vol 100, Issue 40

[Kirill A. Korinsky]

On Sat, 20 Jan 2024 00:01:14 +0100,
Kemper, William wrote:
> 
> There is also a flag: `-XX:+AbortVMOnSafepointTimeout` that will terminate the
> JVM when a safepoint isn't reached before the timeout. This may be preferable
> to leaving the instance in an unresponsive state?

Yes, but it makes quite difficult to find which instance is dead locked.

This is good workaround until the fix is available, but not for the time when we
investigating the root cause.

Probably in few days I'll be back with trace logs.

-- 
wbr, Kirill