RFR: 8324649: Shenandoah: replace implementation of free set [v57]
Roman Kennke
rkennke at openjdk.org
Fri May 10 16:20:23 UTC 2024
On Tue, 7 May 2024 14:35:33 GMT, Kelvin Nilsen <kdnilsen at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Several objectives:
>> 1. Reduce humongous allocation failures by segregating regular regions from humongous regions
>> 2. Do not retire regions just because an allocation failed within the region if the memory remaining within the region is large enough to represent a LAB
>> 3. Track range of empty regions in addition to range of available regions in order to expedite humongous allocations
>> 4. Treat collector reserves as available for Mutator allocations after evacuation completes
>> 5. Improve encapsulation so as to enable an OldCollector reserve for future integration of generational Shenandoah
>>
>> We have compared performance of existing FreeSet implementation with the proposed PR over a broad set of performance workloads and see that the impact is mostly neutral.
>>
>> Comparing 105235.0 metrics from control, 220638.0 from experiment.
>> Compare: 0.589s
>> Most impacted benchmarks | Most impacted metrics
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Shenandoah/jython | cwr_total
>>
>>
>> Only in experiment | Only in control
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> crypto.signverify/trigger_failure | crypto.rsa/cmr_thread_roots
>> extremem-large-31g/adjust_pointers | scimark.sparse.small/concurrent_thread_roots
>> extremem-large-31g/calculate_addresses | xml.transform/concurrent_thread_roots
>> crypto.signverify/class_unloading_rendezvous | mpegaudio/concurrent_weak_roots
>> serial/cmr_total | crypto.rsa/ctr_thread_roots
>>
>> Shenandoah
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> +5.64% jython/cwr_total p=0.00037
>> Control: 1.928ms (+/-272.40us) 170
>> Test: 2.037ms (+/-322.73us) 344
>
> Kelvin Nilsen has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Another attempt at improving clarity of comments
I think it's mostly there. Just a few remainging minor nits.
src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/shenandoahFreeSet.cpp line 100:
> 98: }
> 99:
> 100: ShenandoahRegionPartitions::~ShenandoahRegionPartitions() {
I think there's no need to put this trivial destructor definition in the .cpp file. Just place it with the declaration in the .hpp file.
src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/shenandoahFreeSet.cpp line 144:
> 142: assert (which_partition < NumPartitions, "selected free partition must be valid");
> 143: idx_t idx = _rightmosts[int(which_partition)];
> 144: // _membership[which_partition].is_set(idx) may not be true if we are shrinking the interval
Same here.
src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/shenandoahFreeSet.cpp line 334:
> 332: const char* ShenandoahRegionPartitions::partition_membership_name(idx_t idx) const {
> 333: ShenandoahFreeSetPartitionId result = membership(idx);
> 334: return partition_name(result);
Could make it even more succinct by doing `return partition_name(membership(idx));`
src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/shenandoahSimpleBitMap.cpp line 2:
> 1: /*
> 2: * Copyright (c) 2016, 2021, Red Hat, Inc. All rights reserved.
The copyright seems wrong. This is entirely new code by you, right? Should only have Amazon copyright notice, then.
src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/shenandoahSimpleBitMap.hpp line 3:
> 1: /*
> 2: * Copyright (c) 2016, 2019, Red Hat, Inc. All rights reserved.
> 3: * Copyright Amazon.com Inc. or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
Same copyright issue.
src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/shenandoahSimpleBitMap.hpp line 92:
> 90: }
> 91:
> 92: inline idx_t alignment() const {
I guess this could even be constexpr.
src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/shenandoahSimpleBitMap.inline.hpp line 2:
> 1: /*
> 2: * Copyright (c) 2016, 2019, Red Hat, Inc. All rights reserved.
Same copyright issue.
-------------
Changes requested by rkennke (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17561#pullrequestreview-2049787865
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17561#discussion_r1596812726
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17561#discussion_r1596814322
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17561#discussion_r1596840631
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17561#discussion_r1596860599
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17561#discussion_r1596950049
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17561#discussion_r1596949379
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17561#discussion_r1596950394
More information about the shenandoah-dev
mailing list