RFR: 8352185: Shenandoah: Invalid logic for remembered set verification

[William Kemper]

On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:19:35 GMT, Xiaolong Peng <xpeng at openjdk.org> wrote:

> There are some scenarios in which GenShen may have improper remembered set verification logic:
> 
> 1. Concurrent young cycles following a Full GC:
> 
> In the end of ShenandoahFullGC, it resets bitmaps for the entire heap w/o resetting marking context to be incomplete, but ShenandoahVerifier has code like below to get a complete old marking context for remembered set verification
> 
> 
> ShenandoahVerifier  
> ShenandoahMarkingContext* ShenandoahVerifier::get_marking_context_for_old() {
>   shenandoah_assert_generations_reconciled();
>   if (_heap->old_generation()->is_mark_complete() || _heap->gc_generation()->is_global()) {
>     return _heap->complete_marking_context();
>   }
>   return nullptr;
> }
> 
> 
> For the concurrent young GC cycles after a full GC, the old marking context used for remembered set verification is stale, and may cause unexpected result. 
> 
> 2. For the impl of `ShenandoahVerifier::get_marking_context_for_old` mentioned above, it always return a marking context for global GC, but marking bitmaps is already reset before before init-mark, `ShenandoahVerifier::help_verify_region_rem_set` always skip verification in this case. 
> 
> 3. ShenandoahConcurrentGC always clean remembered set read table, but only swap read/write table when gc generation is young, this issue causes remembered set verification before init-mark to use a completely clean remembered set, but it is covered by issue 2. 
> 
> 
> ### Test
> - [x] `make test TEST=hotspot_gc_shenandoah`

src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/shenandoahVerifier.cpp line 1389:

> 1387:   shenandoah_assert_safepoint();
> 1388:   shenandoah_assert_generational();
> 1389:   ShenandoahMarkingContext* ctx = get_marking_context_for_old();

This should always be `nullptr` after a full GC, right? The marking context is no longer valid after compaction.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24092#discussion_r2001580562