Draft PRs generate mails to ML?

[Andrew Haley]

On 29/10/2020 11:53, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> I try to work in a way which minimizes unnecessary ML traffic, but still
> want to be able to do fine-granular commits. So this generates a lot of ML
> traffic (where before I would just work several days on a webrev until I am
> fine with the new version, then send a single mail). "Going dark" for a
> while would really help.

I agree. I believe that generating emails for PRs in draft state is
unnecessary and fails the principle of least surprise; therefore it
should not be done.

-- 
Andrew Haley  (he/him)
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
https://keybase.io/andrewhaley
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671