RFR: 282: Make the review requirements more explicit in the progress list [v3]

[Guoxiong Li]

On Wed, 11 May 2022 12:40:21 GMT, Guoxiong Li <gli at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> @lgxbslgx I missed reviewing this when it was open, and am just going through the backlog of changes that has happened now.
>> 
>> However, I think this was incorrect. The code here makes the text appears as: 
>> 
>> Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 reviewer)
>> 
>> 
>> when it should have been:
>> 
>> Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
>> 
>> 
>> (Note the capitalization of Reviewer).
>> 
>> Traditionally, the (not very clear, I admit) distinction has been made in OpenJDK between "reviewer" (anyone who offers a review) and a "Reviewer" (a member with the official status as Reviewer for a project). This text is about the latter, so changing the "r" to a "R" in the message made a significant difference.
>> 
>> Can you please fix this in a follow-up PR?
>
> Do the `contributor`, `author`, `committer`, `lead` also need to be changed to `Contributor`, `Author`, `Committer`, `Lead`?

Filed https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/SKARA-1437 to follow up.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/skara/pull/1305