RFR: 1437: Fix the OpenJDK official role name and pluralization

[Guoxiong Li]

On Wed, 11 May 2022 17:06:19 GMT, Erik Joelsson <erikj at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi all,
>> 
>> This patch mainly fixes the following message:
>> 
>> 1. Remove the pluralization if these is 0 reviewer. `no reviews required` --> `no review required`
>> 2. Fix the official role name. eg: `reviewer` --> `Reviewer`, `committers` --> `Committers`
>> 3. Unify the comment and the progress message. ` (with 1 of role reviewers)` --> `(with at least 1 Reviewer)`
>> 4. Fix the pluralization of the comment. ` (with 1 of role reviewers)` --> `(with at least 1 Reviewer)` Note the pluralization.
>> 
>> Thanks for taking the time to review.
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> -- Guoxiong
>
> Reading your comment in the other PR, it got me thinking, if we really want to make it clear that we are referencing the OpenJDK roles, then perhaps we should make each instance of `Reviewer` or `Author` etc be a link to the section in the bylaws. e.g. 1 [Reviewer](http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#reviewer), 2 [Authors](http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#author)

@erikj79 @magicus Thanks for the reviews. Maybe it is good for Erik to re-review it before sponsoring.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/skara/pull/1319