<Swing Dev> RFR JDK-8250639: Address reliance on default constructors in the javax.swing.plaf.multi module

[Prasanta Sadhukhan]

Hi Phil,

I actually erred on that. I should have used 
bughttps://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8250811 which I created for 
this.

I will like probably 3-5 issues out of umbrella task comprising each 
module.  I can see we have 100 issues for plaf.basic and 40 odd for 
plaf.metal so that will be covered in those module.

SHould I sent this review mail again with the above bugid?

Regards

Prasanta

On 30-Jul-20 10:05 PM, Philip Race wrote:
> Let's look at how to logically break it up.
> Sergey's first point was that you are here grabbing the bug that lists 
> all issues
> and making it the fix for everything.
>
> I think you should withdraw this, turn it into an umbrella and file 
> separate issues.
> But let's not make too many issues. It is fairly mechanical and I'd 
> like to err on
> fewer rather than too many. There's overhead to many as well.
>
> -phil.
>
> On 7/30/20, 9:01 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
>> Kevin mentioned even if fx they are breaking it up and tackling these 
>> issue.
>>
>> Regards
>> Prasanta
>>
>> On 30-Jul-20 9:27 PM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
>>> it will be easier for me to break up in parts if I have to do all of 
>>> it.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Prasanta
>>>
>>> On 30-Jul-20 9:26 PM, Joe Darcy wrote:
>>>> If you want to make the changes all in one go, I can accommodate 
>>>> that too.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> -Joe
>>>>
>>>> On 7/30/2020 8:34 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
>>>>> I had talked with Joe and it was decided to break up in parts as 
>>>>> it will be easy for him.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> PRasanta
>>>>>
>>>>> On 30-Jul-20 9:02 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>>>>> On 30.07.2020 01:24, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
>>>>>>> Proposed fix is to create no-arg default constructor for 
>>>>>>> javax.swing.plaf.multi module (as one part of overalll 
>>>>>>> java.desktop change)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This change is about "javax.swing.plaf.multi" package in the 
>>>>>> java.desktop module, but it refers to the JDK-8250639 which is 
>>>>>> about all module.
>>>>>> But I suggest making all changes at once instead of split it to 
>>>>>> tenths different fixes, the changes are identical and easy for 
>>>>>> review.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8250639
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psadhukhan/8250639/webrev.0/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8250812
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Prasanta
>>>>>>
>>>>>>