<Swing Dev> RFR JDK-8250639: Address reliance on default constructors in the javax.swing.plaf.multi module

[Philip Race]

Well let's not use 8250639 so yes a new review.
But I think first step is to file all the sub-issues which I think 
should be by component
area and we'll need to list like Joe did in the description and then we 
should be able
to more easily track that the aggregate is the same ..

Perhaps 8250811 should be for all of Swing unless there's a good reason 
to break up Swing.

-phil.

On 7/30/20, 9:38 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> I actually erred on that. I should have used 
> bughttps://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8250811 which I created 
> for this.
>
> I will like probably 3-5 issues out of umbrella task comprising each 
> module.  I can see we have 100 issues for plaf.basic and 40 odd for 
> plaf.metal so that will be covered in those module.
>
> SHould I sent this review mail again with the above bugid?
>
> Regards
>
> Prasanta
>
> On 30-Jul-20 10:05 PM, Philip Race wrote:
>> Let's look at how to logically break it up.
>> Sergey's first point was that you are here grabbing the bug that 
>> lists all issues
>> and making it the fix for everything.
>>
>> I think you should withdraw this, turn it into an umbrella and file 
>> separate issues.
>> But let's not make too many issues. It is fairly mechanical and I'd 
>> like to err on
>> fewer rather than too many. There's overhead to many as well.
>>
>> -phil.
>>
>> On 7/30/20, 9:01 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
>>> Kevin mentioned even if fx they are breaking it up and tackling 
>>> these issue.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Prasanta
>>>
>>> On 30-Jul-20 9:27 PM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
>>>> it will be easier for me to break up in parts if I have to do all 
>>>> of it.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Prasanta
>>>>
>>>> On 30-Jul-20 9:26 PM, Joe Darcy wrote:
>>>>> If you want to make the changes all in one go, I can accommodate 
>>>>> that too.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/30/2020 8:34 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
>>>>>> I had talked with Joe and it was decided to break up in parts as 
>>>>>> it will be easy for him.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PRasanta
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 30-Jul-20 9:02 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>>>>>> On 30.07.2020 01:24, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
>>>>>>>> Proposed fix is to create no-arg default constructor for 
>>>>>>>> javax.swing.plaf.multi module (as one part of overalll 
>>>>>>>> java.desktop change)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This change is about "javax.swing.plaf.multi" package in the 
>>>>>>> java.desktop module, but it refers to the JDK-8250639 which is 
>>>>>>> about all module.
>>>>>>> But I suggest making all changes at once instead of split it to 
>>>>>>> tenths different fixes, the changes are identical and easy for 
>>>>>>> review.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8250639
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psadhukhan/8250639/webrev.0/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8250812
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Prasanta
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>