@ignored tests
Werner Dietl
wdietl at gmail.com
Fri Apr 12 15:26:26 PDT 2013
Jon,
is it possible that you don't receive type-annotations-dev emails?
I replied to your list of test failures:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-April/000806.html
Cheers,
cu, WMD.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Jonathan Gibbons
<jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com> wrote:
> Werner,
>
> I've recently posted a list of the test failures in the type-annos forest.
> If we set aside the javadoc tests for now, are there other test failures
> we can address?
>
> -- Jon
>
>
>
> On 04/12/2013 02:36 PM, Werner Dietl wrote:
>>
>> Steve,
>>
>> this test case:
>>
>>
>> test/tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/classfile/CombinationsTargetTest3.java
>>
>> is currently passing for me.
>> However, it contains comments like:
>>
>> " // Skip failing cases with bug ID's"
>>
>> so I assumed that it is skipping some tests that it wants to perform.
>> So you're not using "@ignore", but to me it seems like there are more
>> tests that could be enabled.
>>
>> You are correct that all our recent changes are in the
>> type-annotations repositories and not yet in tl or jdk8.
>> Once all bugs are fixed (or ignored), we should work on promoting these
>> changes.
>>
>> cu, WMD.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Steve Sides <steve.sides at oracle.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4/11/2013 10:12 PM, Werner Dietl wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Jon,
>>>>
>>>> I enabled that test and it is passing; as I said in an earlier email,
>>>> I've recently implemented multi-catch type annotations.
>>>> This test case only contains one part to ignore: adding type
>>>> annotations to all components; the EG decided to not implement any of
>>>> the proposals.
>>>>
>>>> I think Steve still has a few test-case combinations disabled, but
>>>> they are all related to repeating type annotations.
>>>
>>> In type-annotation forest non of them are ignored. I realized recently
>>> that
>>> the change to put annotations in the code attribute are not yet in jdk8
>>> forest. Is that right? Can that done soon? So, most all of the more
>>> recent
>>> tests for type-annotations, at least updated versions, are not yet in
>>> jdk8
>>> forest.
>>>
>>> -steve
>>>
>>>> cu, WMD.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Jonathan Gibbons
>>>> <jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, OK, I see we're down to just one test with @ignore in the
>>>>> type-annotations/langtools forest.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> test/tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/newlocations/MultiCatch.java
>>>>>
>>>>> Should I remove @ignore from this test, so that this test goes into the
>>>>> general bucket of tests that need fixing?
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Jon
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 04/11/2013 08:49 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Werner, Steve,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We currently have 6 tests related to type annotations in the JDK 8
>>>>>> forests
>>>>>> that are currently disabled with an @ignore tag.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What does it take to fix the issues causing these tests to be ignored?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Jon
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>
--
http://www.google.com/profiles/wdietl
More information about the type-annotations-dev
mailing list