test failures

[Jonathan Gibbons]

Summary:  TestSmoke is failing because javadoc is not documenting 
annotations on type parameters. I'll make sure Bhavesh knows about this.

-- Jon


On 04/25/2013 02:03 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> On 04/24/2013 09:51 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>>
>> javadoc is believed done, so TestSmoke should be investigated.
>
> So, I'm looking at TestSmoke.   If nothing else, I will shortly push a 
> changeset with minor cleanup, including to sort the test cases into 
> hex-numerical order.  But in so doing I noticed this:
>
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/type-annotations/type-annotations/langtools/file/ac33d03e35b8/test/com/sun/javadoc/typeAnnotations/smoke/pkg/TargetTypes.java
>
>>         39  @Target({TYPE_USE})
>>         40  @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
>>         41  @interface A {}
>>         42  
>>         43  @Target({TYPE_USE})
>>         44  @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
>>         45  @Documented
>>         46  @interface DA {}
>
> Generally, DA is typically used to represent "declaration annotation", 
> so it seems strange to see a target of TYPE_USE on an annotation 
> called DA.
>
> Also, it seems that the test cases in this file use numbering with 
> holes in, that seems similar but not identical to the enum constants 
> in TargetType.  Should we cross-check and.or rationalize these constants?
>
> -- Jon

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/attachments/20130425/a4bc1402/attachment.html