new tests in type-annotations repo

Alex Buckley alex.buckley at oracle.com
Wed Aug 21 18:24:45 PDT 2013


To cut to the chase, the EG isn't going to change anything. Mike is due 
to send a mail about this next week.

Alex

On 8/21/2013 5:57 PM, Werner Dietl wrote:
> Jon, all,
>
>> I'm trying to merge type-annotations up into tl.
>
> Great! Do let me know if there is anything I can do.
>
>
>> I see two new tests, which are failing:
>>
>> A
>> langtools/test/tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/classfile/TestAnonInnerClasses.java
>
> Quoting from my June 19, 2013 message
> (http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-June/001085.html):
>
> ===
> I will not push my updates until the EG decided the desired behavior.
>
> Failing tests T8008762.java and TestAnonInnerClasses.java are waiting
> on this discussion:
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-April/000782.html
>
> There are some refactorings of the Annotations code in the pipeline
> and I suggest we look at these issues again after those refactorings.
> ===
>
> I don't know what the schedule of the EG and the larger annotation
> refactorings are.
>
>
>> A
>> langtools/test/tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/failures/TypeVariableMissingTA.java
>
> I added this test for:
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-July/001130.html
> I didn't get to implement the larger refactoring suggested by Joel.
> Should I add a simple fix to make the test pass?
>
> cu, WMD.
>


More information about the type-annotations-dev mailing list