new tests in type-annotations repo

[Steve Sides]

If there are to be no changes, 
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8006733 should be either marked 
as "fixed" (settled) or not an issue.

And, I have changes for the test for this (and others) as noted in this 
mail,
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-August/001182.html
The changes update the tests to use TYPE_USE in negative tests. This 
case was one of those.

-steve

On 8/21/2013 6:24 PM, Alex Buckley wrote:
> To cut to the chase, the EG isn't going to change anything. Mike is 
> due to send a mail about this next week.
>
> Alex
>
> On 8/21/2013 5:57 PM, Werner Dietl wrote:
>> Jon, all,
>>
>>> I'm trying to merge type-annotations up into tl.
>>
>> Great! Do let me know if there is anything I can do.
>>
>>
>>> I see two new tests, which are failing:
>>>
>>> A
>>> langtools/test/tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/classfile/TestAnonInnerClasses.java 
>>>
>>
>> Quoting from my June 19, 2013 message
>> (http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-June/001085.html): 
>>
>>
>> ===
>> I will not push my updates until the EG decided the desired behavior.
>>
>> Failing tests T8008762.java and TestAnonInnerClasses.java are waiting
>> on this discussion:
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-April/000782.html 
>>
>>
>> There are some refactorings of the Annotations code in the pipeline
>> and I suggest we look at these issues again after those refactorings.
>> ===
>>
>> I don't know what the schedule of the EG and the larger annotation
>> refactorings are.
>>
>>
>>> A
>>> langtools/test/tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/failures/TypeVariableMissingTA.java 
>>>
>>
>> I added this test for:
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-July/001130.html 
>>
>> I didn't get to implement the larger refactoring suggested by Joel.
>> Should I add a simple fix to make the test pass?
>>
>> cu, WMD.
>>