new tests in type-annotations repo

[Werner Dietl]

Steve,

did you see my reply to that message:

http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-August/001183.html

What do you think? If you're happy with your changes I can push them
to type-annotations.

cu, WMD.


On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Steve Sides <steve.sides at oracle.com> wrote:
> On 8/30/2013 9:36 AM, Steve Sides wrote:
>>
>> If there are to be no changes,
>> http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8006733 should be either marked as
>> "fixed" (settled) or not an issue.
>>
>> And, I have changes for the test for this (and others) as noted in this
>> mail,
>>
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-August/001182.html
>> The changes update the tests to use TYPE_USE in negative tests. This case
>> was one of those.
>
> FWIW, I just ran these changes with the latest build of jdk8 and they all
> still pass.
> So, if things are settled and the changes are okay,  I suppose they could go
> into jdk8-tl.
>
> -steve
>
>>
>> -steve
>>
>> On 8/21/2013 6:24 PM, Alex Buckley wrote:
>>>
>>> To cut to the chase, the EG isn't going to change anything. Mike is due
>>> to send a mail about this next week.
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>> On 8/21/2013 5:57 PM, Werner Dietl wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Jon, all,
>>>>
>>>>> I'm trying to merge type-annotations up into tl.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Great! Do let me know if there is anything I can do.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I see two new tests, which are failing:
>>>>>
>>>>> A
>>>>>
>>>>> langtools/test/tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/classfile/TestAnonInnerClasses.java
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Quoting from my June 19, 2013 message
>>>>
>>>> (http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-June/001085.html):
>>>>
>>>> ===
>>>> I will not push my updates until the EG decided the desired behavior.
>>>>
>>>> Failing tests T8008762.java and TestAnonInnerClasses.java are waiting
>>>> on this discussion:
>>>>
>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-April/000782.html
>>>>
>>>> There are some refactorings of the Annotations code in the pipeline
>>>> and I suggest we look at these issues again after those refactorings.
>>>> ===
>>>>
>>>> I don't know what the schedule of the EG and the larger annotation
>>>> refactorings are.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> A
>>>>>
>>>>> langtools/test/tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/failures/TypeVariableMissingTA.java
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I added this test for:
>>>>
>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-July/001130.html
>>>> I didn't get to implement the larger refactoring suggested by Joel.
>>>> Should I add a simple fix to make the test pass?
>>>>
>>>> cu, WMD.
>>>>
>>
>



-- 
http://www.google.com/profiles/wdietl