new tests in type-annotations repo

[Steve Sides]

On 8/30/2013 9:36 AM, Steve Sides wrote:
> If there are to be no changes, 
> http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8006733 should be either marked 
> as "fixed" (settled) or not an issue.
>
> And, I have changes for the test for this (and others) as noted in 
> this mail,
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-August/001182.html 
>
> The changes update the tests to use TYPE_USE in negative tests. This 
> case was one of those.
FWIW, I just ran these changes with the latest build of jdk8 and they 
all still pass.
So, if things are settled and the changes are okay,  I suppose they 
could go into jdk8-tl.

-steve
>
> -steve
>
> On 8/21/2013 6:24 PM, Alex Buckley wrote:
>> To cut to the chase, the EG isn't going to change anything. Mike is 
>> due to send a mail about this next week.
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> On 8/21/2013 5:57 PM, Werner Dietl wrote:
>>> Jon, all,
>>>
>>>> I'm trying to merge type-annotations up into tl.
>>>
>>> Great! Do let me know if there is anything I can do.
>>>
>>>
>>>> I see two new tests, which are failing:
>>>>
>>>> A
>>>> langtools/test/tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/classfile/TestAnonInnerClasses.java 
>>>>
>>>
>>> Quoting from my June 19, 2013 message
>>> (http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-June/001085.html): 
>>>
>>>
>>> ===
>>> I will not push my updates until the EG decided the desired behavior.
>>>
>>> Failing tests T8008762.java and TestAnonInnerClasses.java are waiting
>>> on this discussion:
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-April/000782.html 
>>>
>>>
>>> There are some refactorings of the Annotations code in the pipeline
>>> and I suggest we look at these issues again after those refactorings.
>>> ===
>>>
>>> I don't know what the schedule of the EG and the larger annotation
>>> refactorings are.
>>>
>>>
>>>> A
>>>> langtools/test/tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/failures/TypeVariableMissingTA.java 
>>>>
>>>
>>> I added this test for:
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-July/001130.html 
>>>
>>> I didn't get to implement the larger refactoring suggested by Joel.
>>> Should I add a simple fix to make the test pass?
>>>
>>> cu, WMD.
>>>
>