bug in attribution of annotations in anonymous classes

[Werner Dietl]

Hi Steve,

>>> First, that test case I attached looks a little suspicious.  It may not
>>> be
>>> expected the correct counts.
>>> However, I do still see extra annotations on anonymous classes.
>>> I'll have to give that test a better look.
>>
>> Sorry, I haven't gotten to look at anonymous classes yet.
>
> Good. Gives me more time to fix that test.

I just looked at this issue and can (no longer?) reproduce it.
Please push your test case for this and let me know whether it works
as expected or not.


>>> Second, should type-annotations in lambda expressions be working?
>>> I do not see any written to the classfile.
>>
>> I don't expect anything related to type annotations and lambda to
>> currently work. I've added very basic support, but the EG is still
>> discussing the final storage format.
>
> Yep.  Currently, I can put them there, and it all compiles, but they are
> otherwise ignored.

Type annotations for method and constructor references and their type
arguments are implemented. It would be great if you could expand on
the tests in

tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/referenceinfos/Lambda.java

Type annotations in lambda expressions are still to be implemented -
see the discussion in an earlier mail today.

Thanks,
cu, WMD.

-- 
http://www.google.com/profiles/wdietl