bug in attribution of annotations in anonymous classes

[Steve Sides]

Hi Werner,

This was a while ago. :)

I believe this case has been resolved. The tests were amended for this 
and some other issues.
I posted a patch (http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssides/8007339/) which 
allows the target tests to run and pass.
It has webrev comments describing those changes. The first test now runs 
all test case and the second skips a few failing cases.
I also posted a test for new,cast and array 
levels(http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssides/8005681/).

-steve


On 2/9/2013 6:48 PM, Werner Dietl wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
>>>> First, that test case I attaIched looks a little suspicious.  It may not
>>>> be
>>>> expected the correct counts.
>>>> However, I do still see extra annotations on anonymous classes.
>>>> I'll have to give that test a better look.
>>> Sorry, I haven't gotten to look at anonymous classes yet.
>> Good. Gives me more time to fix that test.
> I just looked at this issue and can (no longer?) reproduce it.
> Please push your test case for this and let me know whether it works
> as expected or not.
>
>
>>>> Second, should type-annotations in lambda expressions be working?
>>>> I do not see any written to the classfile.
>>> I don't expect anything related to type annotations and lambda to
>>> currently work. I've added very basic support, but the EG is still
>>> discussing the final storage format.
>> Yep.  Currently, I can put them there, and it all compiles, but they are
>> otherwise ignored.
> Type annotations for method and constructor references and their type
> arguments are implemented. It would be great if you could expand on
> the tests in
>
> tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/referenceinfos/Lambda.java
>
> Type annotations in lambda expressions are still to be implemented -
> see the discussion in an earlier mail today.
>
> Thanks,
> cu, WMD.
>