webrev.03 for type-annotations test

[Steve Sides]

Thanks, Werner.

While they run correctly as is, I noticed I left these tests a little 
"dirty". :)
In the process of rearranging them I had added some imports that are not 
needed.

When you have time, this removes those unneeded imports:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssides/8005085/webrev.04/

Will you be pulling in the @Repeatable change?
When that happens, these will need to be updated.

thanks,
steve

On 1/16/2013 9:33 PM, Werner Dietl wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> thanks for this revised test case! I've just pushed it:
>
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/type-annotations/type-annotations/langtools/rev/b97997dddcf4
>
> I pushed my current status, but still have a few outstanding issues.
> I will write up concrete questions later today or tomorrow.
>
> Cheers,
> cu, WMD.
>
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Steve Sides <steve.sides at oracle.com> wrote:
>> I've posted a 3rd revision for tests for (repeated)type-annotations on type
>> usages. [1]
>> I updated the webrevComment if you'd like further description of test and
>> changes. [2]
>>
>> Revisions for 1/15/13:
>> 1. Broke scenarios from 2 into 9 (more fine grained evaluation).
>> 2. Moved tests which fail to CombinationsTargetTest2.java(so there are two
>> test new test files).
>> 3. Refactored the test helper to reduce duplicated code.
>> 4. Added sample generated code for each test scenario.
>> 5. Turned on verbose which shows how many annotations are on each element.
>>
>> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssides/8005085/webrev.03/
>> [2] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssides/8005085/webrev.03/webrevComment.txt
>>
>> thx,
>>
>> steve
>>
>
>