bug in attribution of annotations in anonymous classes

[Steve Sides]

Hi Werner,
Two things.

First, that test case I attached looks a little suspicious.  It may not 
be expected the correct counts.
However, I do still see extra annotations on anonymous classes.
I'll have to give that test a better look.

Second, should type-annotations in lambda expressions be working?
I do not see any written to the classfile.

-steve

On 1/16/2013 2:40 PM, Steve Sides wrote:
> Hi Werner,
> While writing tests, I looking at type-annotations on type usage in 
> anonymous classes and found what looks like a bug.
> When compiling the code below, the field 'data' has 2 
> RuntimeVisibleTypeAnnotations, while the field in the anonymous class, 
> 'data2', has3 RuntimeVisibleTypeAnnotations.
> If there are 2 (such as @A @B data2) it has 6 (rather than 4). The 
> same is true for methods. Test cases are attached.
>
> Can you check this out?
>
> 8<- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
>     class testclass {
>         @C String data = "test";
>         void mtest( testclass t){ }
>         public void test() {
>             mtest( new testclass() {
>                      @D String data2 = "test";
>                 });
>         }
>     }
>
>     @Retention(RUNTIME)
>     @Target({TYPE_USE,FIELD})
>     @interface C { }
>
>     @Retention(RUNTIME)
>     @Target({TYPE_USE,FIELD})
>     @interface D {
>
> 8<- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
> thanks,
> steve