bug in attribution of annotations in anonymous classes

[Werner Dietl]

Hi Steve,

> First, that test case I attached looks a little suspicious.  It may not be
> expected the correct counts.
> However, I do still see extra annotations on anonymous classes.
> I'll have to give that test a better look.

Sorry, I haven't gotten to look at anonymous classes yet.


> Second, should type-annotations in lambda expressions be working?
> I do not see any written to the classfile.

I don't expect anything related to type annotations and lambda to
currently work. I've added very basic support, but the EG is still
discussing the final storage format.

cu, WMD.


> On 1/16/2013 2:40 PM, Steve Sides wrote:
>>
>> Hi Werner,
>> While writing tests, I looking at type-annotations on type usage in
>> anonymous classes and found what looks like a bug.
>> When compiling the code below, the field 'data' has 2
>> RuntimeVisibleTypeAnnotations, while the field in the anonymous class,
>> 'data2', has3 RuntimeVisibleTypeAnnotations.
>> If there are 2 (such as @A @B data2) it has 6 (rather than 4). The same is
>> true for methods. Test cases are attached.
>>
>> Can you check this out?
>>
>> 8<- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>
>>     class testclass {
>>         @C String data = "test";
>>         void mtest( testclass t){ }
>>         public void test() {
>>             mtest( new testclass() {
>>                      @D String data2 = "test";
>>                 });
>>         }
>>     }
>>
>>     @Retention(RUNTIME)
>>     @Target({TYPE_USE,FIELD})
>>     @interface C { }
>>
>>     @Retention(RUNTIME)
>>     @Target({TYPE_USE,FIELD})
>>     @interface D {
>>
>> 8<- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>
>> thanks,
>> steve
>
>



-- 
http://www.google.com/profiles/wdietl