Development model & deadlines

[Jonathan Gibbons]

On 01/24/2013 12:50 PM, Steve Sides wrote:
>
> going through type-annotations is okay with me.
> I'm still curious about ongoing testing. Sounds like we should 
> continue to test type-annotations builds nightly (or as there are 
> changes, as is the case now).

Yes, if there are recent changes, it would be good to test them.

>
> Another question, are type-annotations/jdk changes going or have gone 
> into tl/jdk?
> I thought I saw some reflection code in type-annotations/jdk that are 
> not in tl/jdk. 

I was not aware of any changes in type-annotations/jdk; I thought all 
the recent work was in langtools. If you find significant textual 
diffrences (more than white space and copyright dates) please let me know.

-- Jon