Development model & deadlines

[Steve Sides]

On 1/24/2013 1:02 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> On 01/24/2013 12:50 PM, Steve Sides wrote:
>>
>> going through type-annotations is okay with me.
>> I'm still curious about ongoing testing. Sounds like we should 
>> continue to test type-annotations builds nightly (or as there are 
>> changes, as is the case now).
>
> Yes, if there are recent changes, it would be good to test them.
>
>>
>> Another question, are type-annotations/jdk changes going or have gone 
>> into tl/jdk?
>> I thought I saw some reflection code in type-annotations/jdk that are 
>> not in tl/jdk. 
>
> I was not aware of any changes in type-annotations/jdk; I thought all 
> the recent work was in langtools. If you find significant textual 
> diffrences (more than white space and copyright dates) please let me 
> know.
>
> -- Jon
>
I was referring to the 5(?) classes"
AnnotatedArrayType.java
AnnotatedParameterizedType.java
AnnotatedType.java
AnnotatedTypeVariable.java
AnnotatedWildcardType.java

here:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/type-annotations/type-annotations/jdk/file/bc93523615aa/src/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/
but not here:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/file/b3f0e0c79bcc/src/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/

It could be what Alex said regarding Joel's changes.
-steve