[lworld+fp16] RFR: 8308363: Initial compiler support for FP16 scalar operations. [v4]

Xiaohong Gong xgong at openjdk.org
Thu Aug 24 08:43:02 UTC 2023


On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 18:56:32 GMT, Jatin Bhateja <jbhateja at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Starting with 4th Generation Xeon, Intel has made extensive extensions to existing ISA to support 16 bit scalar and vector floating point operations based on IEEE 754 binary16 format.
>> 
>> We plan to support this in multiple stages spanning across Java side definition of Float16 type, scalar operation and finally SLP vectorization support.
>> 
>> This patch adds  minimal Java and Compiler side support for one API Float16.add.
>> 
>> **Summary of changes :-**
>> - Minimal implementation of Float16 primitive class supporting one operation (Float16.add)
>> - X86 AVX512-FP16 feature detection at VM startup.
>> - C2 IR and Inline expander changes for Float16.add API.
>> - FP16 constant folding handling.
>> - Backend support : Instruction selection patterns and assembler support.
>> - New IR framework and functional tests.
>> 
>> **Implementation details:-**
>> 
>> 1/ Newly defined Float16 class encapsulate a short value holding IEEE 754 binary16 encoded value.
>> 
>> 2/ Float16 is a primitive class which in future will be aligned with other enhanced primitive wrapper classes proposed by [JEP-402.](https://openjdk.org/jeps/402)
>> 
>> 3/ Float16 to support all the operations supported by corresponding Float class.
>> 
>> 4/ Java implementation of each API will internally perform floating point operation at FP32 granularity.
>> 
>> 5/ API which can be directly mapped to an Intel AVX512FP16 instruction will be a candidate for intensification by C2 compiler.
>> 
>> 6/ With Valhalla, C2 compiler always creates an InlineType IR node for a value class instance.
>> Total number of inputs of an InlineType node match the number of non-static fields. In this case node will have one input of short type TypeInt::SHORT.
>> 
>> 7/ Since all the scalar AVX512FP16 instructions operate on floating point registers and Float16 backing storage is held in a general-purpose register hence we need to introduce appropriate conversion IR which moves a 16-bit value from GPR to a XMM register and vice versa.
>> ![image](https://github.com/openjdk/valhalla/assets/59989778/192fca7e-6b7e-4e62-9b09-677e33eca48d)
>> 
>> 8/ Current plan is to introduce a new IR node for each operation which is a subclass of its corresponding single precision IR node. This will allow leveraging idealization routines (Ideal/Identity/Value) of its parent operation.
>> 
>> 9/ All the single/double precision IR nodes carry a Type::FLOAT/DOUBLE ideal type. This represents entire FP32/64 value range and is different from integral types which expli...
>
> Jatin Bhateja has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Addressing offline review comments from Sandhya, new IR test addition.

src/hotspot/share/classfile/classFileParser.cpp line 5176:

> 5174:       // Can't enable this check fully until JDK upgrades the bytecode generators (TODO: JDK-8270852).
> 5175:       // For now, compare to class file version 51 so old verifier doesn't see Q signatures.
> 5176:       if ( (_major_version < 51 /* CONSTANT_CLASS_DESCRIPTORS */ ) || (!EnablePrimitiveClasses && !is_jdk_internal_class_sig(signature))) {

The last condition `(!EnablePrimitiveClasses && !is_jdk_internal_class_sig(signature))` seems not right to me. Assume there is a jdk internal primitive class defined , and `EnablePrimitiveClasses` is disabled, then result of `(!EnablePrimitiveClasses && !is_jdk_internal_class_sig(signature))` is `false` (i.e. `true && false`), then the followed error is not printed if the jdk version matches >= 51. But it should report the error since `EnablePrimitiveClasses` is closed.  So it should be:

if ( (_major_version < 51 /* CONSTANT_CLASS_DESCRIPTORS */ ) || !EnablePrimitiveClasses || !is_jdk_internal_class_sig(signature))

right?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/848#discussion_r1303999255



More information about the valhalla-dev mailing list