[lworld] RFR: 8371357: [lworld] Remove EnableValhalla [v3]
Paul Hübner
phubner at openjdk.org
Tue Dec 16 10:19:30 UTC 2025
On Mon, 15 Dec 2025 22:30:27 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty <dcubed at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Paul Hübner has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 23 commits:
>>
>> - Use the new function for the Parallel changes.
>> - Merge branch 'lworld' into JDK-8371357
>> - Remove wrong comment.
>> - Fix imports.
>> - Reviewer comments.
>> - Copyright.
>> - Revert "Don't synchronize on Double."
>>
>> This reverts commit cbf849c2ce6059af2b43b3dd8cb42445eab4df2b.
>> - Accidentally changed too many enable_preview.
>> - Make heap dump test require debug VM.
>> - Change to arguments.
>> - ... and 13 more: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/compare/8c0c190b...58fb031a
>
> src/hotspot/share/oops/arrayOop.hpp line 59:
>
>> 57: // Given a type, return true if elements of that type must be aligned to 64-bit.
>> 58: static bool element_type_should_be_aligned(BasicType type) {
>> 59: if (type == T_FLAT_ELEMENT) {
>
> You don't need `EnableValhalla` or `Arguments::is_valhalla_enabled()` as long as all callers
> of `element_type_should_be_aligned()` only pass known valid BasicType values. If any caller
> passes a non-valid BasicType value as part of a "probing call", then a call with a value that
> happens to match `T_FLAT_ELEMENT` by a VM with `Arguments::is_valhalla_enabled() == false`
> will return `true` unexpectedly.
I think this should be fine because `T_FLAT_ELEMENT` is hardcoded to `15` regardless of if Valhalla/preview is enabled.
> src/hotspot/share/runtime/arguments.cpp line 4006:
>
>> 4004: FLAG_SET_DEFAULT(BytecodeVerificationRemote, true);
>> 4005: }
>> 4006: if (is_valhalla_enabled() || (is_interpreter_only() && !CDSConfig::is_dumping_archive() && !UseSharedSpaces)) {
>
> Hmmm... The original logic is `!EnableValhalla` so shouldn't this be: `!is_valhalla_enabled()`?
You're right. Good spot!
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1759#discussion_r2622631986
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1759#discussion_r2622645808
More information about the valhalla-dev
mailing list