Fwd: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Small patch for multi-catch :)
Bradford Wetmore
bradford.wetmore at oracle.com
Sun Jul 24 20:45:05 PDT 2011
I'll add it ASAP.
Brad
On 7/24/2011 8:06 PM, Phil Race wrote:
> I think that was overly specific because JDK8 was in an unimagineable
> future.
> I'm sure JDK 8 is included until there's something else, presumably better.
>
> Note that this was a patch, not a bug, per the guidelines.
>
> -phil.
>
> On 7/24/11 7:21 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>> Phil Race said the following on 07/24/11 02:16:
>>> Apparently bugs.openjdk.java.net hasn't heard of JDK 8
>>
>> bugs.openjdk is not a general purpose bug reporting system. As it
>> still states there:
>>
>> "During the initial rollout phase, this site will only be accepting
>> and tracking patch contributions to the OpenJDK 6 and 7 forests. Until
>> the remainder of the site is ready, please continue to file normal bug
>> reports via http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/index.jsp.
>>
>> Regular bug reports filed here during the rollout period will be
>> summarily closed. "
>>
>> ---
>>
>> we never went past "initial rollout phase".
>>
>> Now that 7 is almost out the door and 8 is underway I would suggest
>> making bugs.openjdk read-only.
>>
>> David
>>
>>> -phil.
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Small patch for multi-catch :)
>>> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 13:35:27 +0200
>>> From: Mario Torre <neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com>
>>> To: Phil Race <philip.race at oracle.com>
>>> CC: 2d-dev at openjdk.java.net
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2011/7/23 Phil Race<philip.race at oracle.com>:
>>>> Looks OK .. you'll need to generate yourself a bug id.
>>>>
>>>> -phil.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hello Phil,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the quick answer. I filed a new bug report, the ID is 100195:
>>>
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100195
>>>
>>> I could not set the target release as JDK8, though.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Mario
>
More information about the web-discuss
mailing list