Update on bug system for OpenJDK

[Steve Poole]

On 06/06/11 19:13, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> On Jun 5, 2011, at 8:55 PM, Roger Calnan wrote:
>
>>>
>>> From the comparison based on our requirements one system comes out 
>>> ahead, and that is JIRA.
>> let's move this effort into the decision phase as this clearly we won't
>> make a choice that pleases everyone, but we need a decision and move on.
>
> I agree.
>
> ---
>
> Regardless of any perceptions that this analysis might have 
> been biased, I don't see it that way.
> I have not been directly involved in this analysis, except as a deeply 
> interested bystander.
> In any evaluation like this, given the list of requirements, sometimes 
> one choice starts standing out
> well above the other, and the resulting report may appear to be biased 
> when it is actually reflecting the
> obvious choice that stood out during the analysis.
>
> I'm not a huge fan of any bug tracking system, and with any new one I 
> am given to use, I will grumble and
> complain like everyone else, initially, then learn to live with it, or 
> fix it. Let's get it in place and move on.
yep - my sentiments too.   We need to move towards a public 
proof-of-concept now so we can see how it could work before committing 
to a final configuration.

>
> It's like the kids in the car that keep asking "Are we there yet?". 
> I'd like to say "Yes! Now will you shut up!"  Nicely. ;^)
>
> -kto
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/web-discuss/attachments/20110608/1140d1d8/attachment.html