[RFR] jdk9.0.4+12 + functionality
Edward Nevill
edward.nevill at gmail.com
Wed Apr 11 18:11:15 UTC 2018
On Wed, 2018-04-11 at 18:57 +0300, Andrey Petushkov wrote:
> > On 11 Apr 2018, at 18:46, Edward Nevill <edward.nevill at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'll try the c2 build next,
> > Ed.
>
The c2 build seems to build OK and I have done a few basic tests on the resultant image.
I notice that the default build is 'aarch32' which means that there is no way to specify the 'arm' build.
>From the help
--with-cpu-port specify sources to use for Hotspot 64-bit ARM port
(arm64,aarch64,aarch32) [aarch64]
If the default is aarch32 then there needs to be another option 'arm' to allow you to build the existing arm32 c2.
I am uneasy about your copyright notices:-
+// This file is a derivative work resulting from (and including) modifications
+// made by Azul Systems, Inc. The dates of such changes are 2013-2018.
+// Copyright 2013-2018 Azul Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
+//
+// Please contact Azul Systems, 385 Moffett Park Drive, Suite 115, Sunnyvale,
+// CA 94089 USA or visit www.azul.com if you need additional information or
+// have any questions.
If you are unable to use the existing copyright format, viz
* Copyright (c) 2014, Red Hat Inc. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2015, Linaro Ltd. All rights reserved.
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
then the copyright notices will have to be reviewed by someone in authority at Oracle.
Also, I notice in some cases you have applied copyright notices where there are no changes to the file (other than the copyright notices).
I need to spend more time looking through your patch in more detail. Unfortunately I am at work for the next few days so it is likely to be the start of next week before I can have a detailed look at this.
All the best,
Ed.
More information about the aarch32-port-dev
mailing list