Found a bug?
David Alayachew
davidalayachew at gmail.com
Sat Jul 15 03:45:18 UTC 2023
And if I replace that snippet with this, I get the expected and desirable
compiler error "didn't cover all switch cases" (referring to the parent
switch where that statement is actually true).
public List<Symbol> stateTransitions(final InternalState internalState)
{
return
switch (this)
{
case C -> ADD_SYMBOLS.apply(List.of(NUMBER,
SUB_STATE_OPERATOR), List.of());
case CE -> ADD_SYMBOLS.apply(List.of(NUMBER,
SUB_STATE_OPERATOR), List.of(C));
case BACKSPACE -> switch (internalState)
{
case InternalState(_, ConsEmpty(), _, _,
_, _) -> ADD_SYMBOLS.apply(List.of(NUMBER, SUB_STATE_OPERATOR), List.of(C,
CE));
case InternalState is
-> ADD_SYMBOLS.apply(List.of(NUMBER, SUB_STATE_OPERATOR,
SCREEN_OPERATOR), List.of());
};
};
}
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/amber-dev/attachments/20230714/e35c7426/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the amber-dev
mailing list