RFR: 8326509: Clean up JNIEXPORT in Hotspot after JDK-8017234 [v2]

[Magnus Ihse Bursie]

On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 11:35:19 GMT, Bernhard Urban-Forster <burban at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Ah, right, there is a Windows/aarch64 port. Forgot about it. :(
>> 
>> I don't know who maintains/cares about that port anymore. Pinging @mo-beck @lewurm @luhenry. Do anyone of you care about this anymore? If not, do you know if anyone has taken up the baton? (Or maybe it's time to retire the Windows/aarch64 port)
>
> cc @karianna @gdams, is there a Windows/AArch64 owner?
> 
>> Or maybe it's time to retire the Windows/aarch64 port
> 
> I guess Windows/AArch64 as a platform hasn't really taken off _yet_, give it a few more years 😉 I certainly would not advocate for removing it.

Instead of discussing removal of windows/aarch64 (although the general rule in OpenJDK is that ports that are not maintained by anyone should be removed); let's stick to the question here: do we need to export `das1()` for debugging?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17967#discussion_r1500547680