Time to put a stop to Thread.stop?
Paul Sandoz
paul.sandoz at oracle.com
Thu May 16 14:38:02 UTC 2013
On May 16, 2013, at 2:00 PM, Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com> wrote:
> On 16/05/2013 11:03, David Holmes wrote:
>>
>> Yes - I don't think we need @Retired as a stepping stone between @Deprecated and gone. But to date @Deprecated's notion of "some point in the future" is a future yet to materialize. :(
>>
>> But that more general debate deserves it's own thread.
>>
> Yes, this proposal was always likely to start a more bigger discussion and that would be good to have.
>
> For this thread then the proposal is simply to scuttle Thread.stop(Throwable), maybe suspend/resume later. I'm not too concerned about jdk tests, we can change them. The only real concern is whether there are any real impact beyond the sleazy usages already mentioned.
>
How about doing a search for usages in all the jars on maven central?
IMHO it really helps drive the discussions deprecation if we have some empirical data.
Paul.
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list