Request for reviews .02 (M): 6961697: move nmethod constants section before instruction section
Vladimir Kozlov
vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com
Thu Aug 19 22:04:13 PDT 2010
Christian,
Are these changes made above 6978355 changes? I did not find code_offset() definition in this changes?
Why you removed oops section print in nmethod.cpp?
What about FIXME commented assert in relocInfo.cpp?
Otherwise this looks good.
Thanks,
Vladimir
On 8/19/10 11:38 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 21:18 +0200, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>> I agree on that. When I've finished the new webrev I will merge it with
>> the other workspace and do some performance evaluation.
>
> So here's the new version:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~twisti/6961697/webrev.02/
>
> This one is completely different to the ones before and much simpler.
> The renaming part was moved to 6978355 and I only changed the order of
> the code sections: consts, insts, stubs. The CodeBuffer works as
> before and the memory layout is the same. But when the CodeBuffer is
> later copied into a CodeBlob the consts sections moves to the beginning.
>
> I did a lot of testing with the changes of 6961690.
>
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list