RFR(XS): 8168086: 8166869 broke jvmci build on aarch64

[Vladimir Kozlov]

Okay, lets wait Jesper's approval.

Vladimir

On 10/17/16 10:06 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
> So this is an AARCH64 specific change and I'm good with this change
> going in, but I'm not Jesper.
>
> I've re-read Jesper's internal email about allowing urgent changes
> to be pushed and it certainly sounds like he wants to approve the
> urgent changes on a case-by-case basis.
>
> I recommend waiting until you hear from Jesper, but that's just
> my opinion.
>
> Dan
>
>
> On 10/17/16 10:34 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> Changes does not affect code which we test. But RH can't build their
>> aarch64 port - they need to resolve it ASAP. Jesper said that we can
>> push urgent changes.
>>
>> Vladimir
>>
>> On 10/17/16 9:30 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>>> Jesper (as the JDK9-hs GK) needs to agree to this push since
>>> JDK9-hs is currently closed.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/17/16 10:16 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>>>> Looks good.
>>>>
>>>> Please, push it into jdk9/hs since hs-comp is closed and RO from now
>>>> on.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Vladimir
>>>>
>>>> On 10/17/16 8:58 AM, Roland Westrelin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> 8166869 was missing a similar aarch64 change which, I suppose, is
>>>>> something like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~roland/8168086/webrev.00/
>>>>>
>>>>> Roland.
>>>>>
>>>
>