jdk10 RFR for JDK-8167423: Incorrect implementation of JDK_Version::to_string OR proper return statement is missing OR proper comment is needed

Shafi Ahmad shafi.s.ahmad at oracle.com
Thu Feb 23 09:28:49 UTC 2017


Hi Coleen, David,

This is reviewed for jdk10 but when I sent for push to one of my colleague he has suggested me to push is jdk9 and this will automatically pushed to jdk10.

So can this be pushed this to jdk9? If yes should I sent a separate review request or current review is sufficient?

Regards,
Shafi 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shafi Ahmad
> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 1:56 PM
> To: Coleen Phillimore <coleen.phillimore at oracle.com>; hotspot-
> dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: RE: jdk10 RFR for JDK-8167423: Incorrect implementation of
> JDK_Version::to_string OR proper return statement is missing OR proper
> comment is needed
> 
> Hi Coleen,
> 
> Thank you for the review.
> 
> Regards,
> Shafi
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Coleen Phillimore
> > Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 2:09 AM
> > To: hotspot-dev at openjdk.java.net
> > Subject: Re: jdk10 RFR for JDK-8167423: Incorrect implementation of
> > JDK_Version::to_string OR proper return statement is missing OR proper
> > comment is needed
> >
> > Shafi,
> > This looks good to me also.  Thank you for fixing this.
> > Coleen
> >
> > On 2/15/17 6:35 AM, Shafi Ahmad wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Summary: Adding return value check and update index variable.  It's
> > > a very
> > small change to single file.
> > >
> > > Webrev link:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shshahma/8167423/webrev.00/
> > > bug link: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8167423
> > >
> > > Testing: jprt  and jtreg test.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Shafi
> >


More information about the hotspot-dev mailing list