Inconsistent "Fix Version: 15" for JDK-8247367
Aleksey Shipilev
shade at redhat.com
Mon Jun 15 18:18:03 UTC 2020
On 6/15/20 5:30 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
> JDK-8247367 Shenandoah: pacer should wait on lock instead of
> exponential backoff
>
> to have a 'Fix Version/s' value of '16' instead of '15'.
Thanks.
> I have re-opened the backport bug:
>
> JDK-8247468 Shenandoah: pacer should wait on lock instead of
> exponential backoff
>
> changed the 'Affects Version/s' value to '15'. If you don't intend to
> backport the fix for JDK-8247367 to JDK15, then we can close the backport
> as "Won't Fix".
I did intend to push this for jdk15. I'll figure the rest out.
> It looks like just your bug (JDK-8247367) got caught in the worm hole. :-)
Yes, suspected as much. Thanks for investigating!
--
Thanks,
-Aleksey
More information about the jdk-dev
mailing list