Outdated JDK 10 fix request process page?

[Andrew Hughes]

On 2 May 2018 at 16:46, Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Wed, 2018-05-02 at 16:15 +0100, Rob McKenna wrote:
>> Hi Severin,
>>
>> The jdk & jdk-updates projects are considered separate.
>
> OK.
>
>> I personally like the idea of keeping the old JDK fix process pages
>> around for archival purposes, but perhaps it would make sense to add a
>> link pointing to the newer updates processes once the JDK release GA's.
>> Hopefully this would solve your issue?
>
> That sounds good.
>
> Just to clarify my point of view. I'm an OpenJDK contributor and I need
> to look up documents to find the right process to get fixes in. If
> there are more than one document describing the fix process for the
> same release, I get confused. In this instance it's Then I'd be better
> off to ask what the the right way of doing things in terms of process
> is. That adds to the burden of both, contributors and maintainers. For
> that reason I think it would be a good idea if deprecated documents can
> be marked as such possibly linking to the document which superceeded
> it.
>
> Thanks,
> Severin
>

I agree. This is a continuing problem with keeping around the old
web pages, mailing lists and Mercurial trees.
-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222