[11u] Downport closed changes?

[Chris Hegarty]

Hi Goetz,

> On 13 Dec 2019, at 12:19, Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> To avoid confusion, I split the page in two …

Thanks for the clarification. I quickly scanned the list and opened any
bug that I am confident was mistakenly not-open in the first place. So,
just 8203672 ( that I know of ).

-Chris.

> Best regards,
>  Goetz.
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net> On
>> Behalf Of Lindenmaier, Goetz
>> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 1:12 PM
>> To: 'Chris Hegarty' <chris.hegarty at oracle.com>
>> Cc: jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
>> Subject: [CAUTION] RE: [11u] Downport closed changes?
>> 
>> Hi Chris,
>> 
>> The list has two parts:
>> First changes that are not in 11u.
>> Second changes that are closed but already in 11u.
>> Second holds for all the security fixes, e.g..
>> 
>> Maybe I should put it on two pages ... it's easy to
>> miss the heading in the middle.
>> 
>> Best,
>>  Goetz.
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Chris Hegarty <chris.hegarty at oracle.com>
>>> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 1:05 PM
>>> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>
>>> Cc: jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net
>>> Subject: Re: [11u] Downport closed changes?
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>>> On 13 Dec 2019, at 11:42, Lindenmaier, Goetz
>> <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> Although Oracle has the policy to push only changes that have
>>>> publicly visible JBS bugs, they once in a while push changes
>>>> where the bug is hidden.
>>>> Currently, we can see which changes are downported by Oracle
>>>> to their internal 11u project, and do so for OpenJDK, too.
>>>> This is not the case for such closed bugs.
>>>> 
>>>> Therefore I enumerated these closed bugs and want to ask
>>>> the 11u community to scan the list and eventually downport
>>>> changes that seem useful in 11u.
>>>> 
>>>> Overall, there are 78 bugs to look at, see this list:
>>>> 
>>> 
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/closed_bugs_not_in_11/closed_bugs_no
>>> t_in_11.html
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Maybe I don’t understand what this list is trying to convey, so as an
>>> example: 8223892 is on the list, but is also in jdk11u [1]. Why is
>>> 8223892 on the list if it is already in 11u?
>>> 
>>> -Chris.
>>> 
>>> [1] https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk11u/log?rev=8223892