[Fwd: code review round 0 for JVM/TI version fix (6849968) and phase assertion (6648438)]
Daniel D. Daugherty
Daniel.Daugherty at Sun.COM
Mon Dec 14 15:10:57 PST 2009
Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
> Dan,
>
> Assuming this has been reviewed and approved by the serviceability team,
Since I'm the only one on Serviceability right now, I
went for a more general review. :-)
David Holmes and Kelly O'Hair both reviewed and approved.
Dan
> you're free to push this into the OpenJDK 6 repo. The current build
> number to use is b18.
Thanks. It will be in the JPRT-HotSpotWest queue shortly...
Dan
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Joe
>
> Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>> Joe,
>>
>> These fixes are ready to be pushed in OpenJDK6. I've already
>> done the pushed into HSX-16.1 and HSX-17 (RT_Baseline).
>>
>> Please let me know if I can push these...
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: code review round 0 for JVM/TI version fix (6849968) and
>> phase assertion (6648438)
>> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:52:38 -0700
>> From: Daniel D. Daugherty <Daniel.Daugherty at Sun.COM>
>> Reply-To: Daniel.Daugherty at Sun.COM
>> To: serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net
>> <serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net>,
>> serviceability-dev-confidential at sun.com
>>
>>
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I have fixes for the following two JVM/TI bugs ready to go:
>>
>> 6648438 4/4 src/share/vm/prims/jvmtiEnv.cpp:457
>> assert(phase == JVMTI_PHASE_LIVE,"sanity check")
>> 6849968 3/3 JVMTI tests fails on jdk5.0 with hs14
>>
>> 6849968 fixes a problem where JVM/TI version 1.0 semantics
>> were not being used when that version was explicitly
>> requested. I fixed 6648438 because it happened to be in the
>> same place that I already had to tweak for 6849968. It also
>> gets rid of an annoying intermittent fastdebug failure.
>>
>> Here is the webrev URL:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/batch-20091211-webrev/0/
>>
>> This webrev is relative to the OpenJDK6 version of the code.
>> Once approved, these fixes will be pushed to:
>>
>> - OpenJDK6 (HSX-14-??)
>> - JDK6-Update train (HSX-16-??)
>> - OpenJDK7 (HSX-17-??)
>>
>> Comments, questions and suggestions are always welcome!
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>
More information about the jdk6-dev
mailing list