[Fwd: code review round 0 for JVM/TI version fix (6849968) and phase assertion (6648438)]

Daniel D. Daugherty Daniel.Daugherty at Sun.COM
Mon Dec 14 15:10:57 PST 2009


Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
> Dan,
>
> Assuming this has been reviewed and approved by the serviceability team,

Since I'm the only one on Serviceability right now, I
went for a more general review. :-)

David Holmes and Kelly O'Hair both reviewed and approved.

Dan

> you're free to push this into the OpenJDK 6 repo.  The current build 
> number to use is b18.

Thanks. It will be in the JPRT-HotSpotWest queue shortly...

Dan

>
> Thanks,
>
> -Joe
>
> Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>> Joe,
>>
>> These fixes are ready to be pushed in OpenJDK6. I've already
>> done the pushed into HSX-16.1 and HSX-17 (RT_Baseline).
>>
>> Please let me know if I can push these...
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject:     code review round 0 for JVM/TI version fix (6849968) and 
>> phase assertion (6648438)
>> Date:     Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:52:38 -0700
>> From:     Daniel D. Daugherty <Daniel.Daugherty at Sun.COM>
>> Reply-To:     Daniel.Daugherty at Sun.COM
>> To:     serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net 
>> <serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net>, 
>> serviceability-dev-confidential at sun.com
>>
>>
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I have fixes for the following two JVM/TI bugs ready to go:
>>
>> 6648438 4/4 src/share/vm/prims/jvmtiEnv.cpp:457
>>           assert(phase == JVMTI_PHASE_LIVE,"sanity check")
>> 6849968 3/3 JVMTI tests fails on jdk5.0 with hs14
>>
>> 6849968 fixes a problem where JVM/TI version 1.0 semantics
>> were not being used when that version was explicitly
>> requested. I fixed 6648438 because it happened to be in the
>> same place that I already had to tweak for 6849968. It also
>> gets rid of an annoying intermittent fastdebug failure.
>>
>> Here is the webrev URL:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/batch-20091211-webrev/0/
>>
>> This webrev is relative to the OpenJDK6 version of the code.
>> Once approved, these fixes will be pushed to:
>>
>> - OpenJDK6 (HSX-14-??)
>> - JDK6-Update train (HSX-16-??)
>> - OpenJDK7 (HSX-17-??)
>>
>> Comments, questions and suggestions are always welcome!
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>


More information about the jdk6-dev mailing list