RFR[8u backport] 8213992: Rename and make DieOnSafepointTimeout the diagnostic option

[Zhengyu Gu]

Thanks, Paul!

I requested 11u backport, waiting for approval.

-Zhengyu

On 11/26/18 1:09 PM, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
> Lgtm too, and +1 on backporting to 11u as well. I'm a bit surprised that the original RFE doesn't have a CSR, since it changed an interface. But, since there was no CSR for the original RFE, imo there's no need for one for backports.
> 
> Paul
> 
> On 11/26/18, 9:39 AM, "jdk8u-dev on behalf of Zhengyu Gu" <jdk8u-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net on behalf of zgu at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>      Thanks, Aleksey!
>      
>      -Zhengyu
>      
>      On 11/25/18 1:29 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>      > Not the 8u Reviewer, but backport webrev looks fine to me.
>      >
>      > Thanks,
>      > -Aleksey
>      >
>      > On 11/25/18 7:02 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>      >> Hi Aleksey,
>      >>
>      >> Can I take this as reviewed?
>      >>
>      >> Thanks,
>      >>
>      >> -Zhengyu
>      >>
>      >> On 11/23/18 8:19 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>      >>> Needs to be backported to jdk11 too?
>      >>>
>      >>> -Aleksey
>      >>>
>      >>> On 11/23/18 1:45 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>      >>>> Hi,
>      >>>>
>      >>>> I would like to backport this RFE, it helps to debug long safepoint sync time.
>      >>>>
>      >>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213992
>      >>>> Original review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2018-November/035255.html
>      >>>>
>      >>>> Backport has only minor conflicts.
>      >>>> Backport Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8213992-8u/webrev.00/
>      >>>>
>      >>>>
>      >>>> Thanks,
>      >>>>
>      >>>> -Zhengyu
>      >>>
>      >>>
>      >
>      >
>      
>